The Central Limit Theorem assures that Maximum Likelihood Estimators
have, asymptotically, a multivariate normal density. As a
consequence of that normal behavior, Log Likelihood Ratios have a
Chi-Square density. That means we can use
as a measure of closeness in the neighborhood of the MLE itself, and
thus we have a criterion for constructing confidence bounds.
(It's kinda useful.)
The normal distribution is the parent density for many
other distributions, and has a close familial relationship with many more.
For example, Sums of
Squares of samples from the standard normal distribution have a chi-square
distribution,
.
Now, if something has a probability density, then we can evaluate the
probability that the something takes on values as extreme, or more
extreme, than what we are interested in. In our case we have the
distribution of the logarithm of the ratio of the Weibull parameters,
,
to their maximum values, the MLEs. We can move the
,
pair away from their maximum likelihood values and see the effect on the Weibull model.
If we don't move too far the resulting model will still be plausible,
but not optimal (given the data).
How far is too far? If we choose a 95% confidence neighborhood,
then the distance is
/2
(evaluated at 2 degrees-of-freedom, since we have two model parameters)(1).
We now have everything we need to construct a confidence neighborhood
around the MLEs for the (
,
)
pair. Every point on that boundary will correspond to a (
,
)
pair, and each pair represents a Weibull model. Construct all the
models: the locus of their extremes is the corresponding 95% confidence
bound on the Weibull model.
Notes: (1) The textbook definition for
the loglikelihood ratio places the alternate parameter values in the
numerator and the MLEs in the denominator, so that the
quantity -2log(likelihood ratio) is distributed asymptotically as
chi-square, with df = number of parameters in the model.
Computationally that is equivalent to looking at the ratio of alternate
values for
,
to their MLEs (so the maximum ratio is 1 and the log is thus zero) in
which case the log(likelihood ratio) is distributed as is
/2.